Michael Jackson found not guilty

TDWoj

Administrator
Staff member
Michael Jackson found not guilty on all charges

CTV.ca News Staff

Pop superstar Michael Jackson has been found not guilty of molesting a 13-year-old cancer patient and then holding him hostage at his mansion, vindicating the "King of Pop" who maintained his innocence all along.

The California jury cleared Jackson on all 10 charges in the child molestation and conspiracy trial after seven days of deliberations.

His lead defense attorney, Thomas Mesereau Jr., told reporters on his way out of the courthouse that "justice was done.

"The man's innocent. He always was," Mesereau said.

According to courtroom observers, Jackson dabbed his eyes with a tissue after he was cleared of all the charges.

Had he been convicted on all charges, the 46-year-old entertainer could have faced almost two decades in prison.

Flanked by several family members, Jackson emerged to the whoops and hollers of celebrating fans, but did not stop to make a statement.

Despite his subdued reaction in public, Jackson celebrated on his website, where his acquittal was compared to the fall of the Berlin Wall and Nelson Mandela's release from prison.

"Remember this date, for it is a part of HIStory," says the site, which Jackson set up to provide information during his trial.

Outside the courthouse, fans cheered and threw confetti, obviously prepared for such a victory. One woman released a white dove for every acquittal that was read.

"These are the people who have been here from the beginning," said CTV's Graham Richardson of the fans who hung in until the verdict.

D.A. careful with media

"Obviously, we're disappointed in the verdict ... but we believe in the system of justice," Santa Barbara District Attorney Tom Sneddon told reporters.

When asked about whether he was concerned that at least one of the jurors was peddling a book deal, Sneddon was vague in his response.

"Let's just say that it was taken care of by the court."

Meanwhile, there are unconfirmed reports that Jackson's legal troubles may not be over.

"There have been reports that the main prosecutor, Sneddon, has plans to refile charges right away," Richardson reported earlier.

But Sneddon would not, however, say whether his office would be launching any other legal battles against Jackson.

"No comment," Sneddon said, when asked by reporters.

The indictment contained one count of an attempted lewd act, four counts of administering an intoxicating agent - alcohol - for the purpose of committing a felony: child molestation, one count of conspiracy involving child abduction, false imprisonment and extortion.

"It's very impressive that they were able to come to an agreement on all of those counts, but at the same time I think what is interesting about this, is that it is something we will continue to argue and debate," media analyst Anne-Marie Kinahan said, appearing on CTV Newsnet.

While the jurors remained guarded about the the details of their seven days of deliberations, they offered reporters some insight during a news conference.

One juror said of the accuser's mother: "I disliked it intensely when she snapped her fingers at us."

She said she thought to herself: "Don't snap your fingers at me, lady."

Meanwhile, another juror, said: "I think we all just looked at the evidence and pretty much agreed."

None of the jurors were identified.

During the trial, Mesereau Jr., called the accuser's family's allegations "the biggest con of their careers."

He painted the accuser's mother to be a welfare cheat who exploited her son's cancer for profit. He also claimed she lived lavishly at a time when she said she was being held against her will.

Prosecutor Ron Zonen cast Jackson as a serial pedophile with a history of fondling boys. He used charts and graphics to show what he said was a pattern of criminal behavior and said Jackson carefully chose the kind of boys he wanted to prey upon.

Turning points in the trial

The jury had to weigh about 600 pieces of evidence and the testimony of more than 140 witnesses in their decision.

Many of those who had been scheduled to testify never appeared, including Larry King and Liz Taylor. But Macaulay Culkin, Chris Tucker and Jay Leno all grabbed headlines with their testimony.

The prosecution was dealt a blow when Jackson's ex-wife Deborah Rowe, the mother of his two eldest children, contradicted Sneddon's opening statement claim that she would relate being manipulated by Jackson associates.

Instead, she called the co-conspirators "opportunistic vultures" and said they conspired against Jackson, not with him, scheming to make millions from his troubles.

Later, the accuser's mother was grilled under cross-examination and admitted to lying under oath in an unrelated lawsuit.

While Jackson never took the stand in his own defence, his accuser did. He testified that Jackson showed him adult websites during his first visit to Neverland. He said he was later molested twice in Jackson's bedroom. A tape of his interview with police on July 6, 2003 was also shown.

In the tape, the accuser alleges that Jackson masturbated him "five or so" times. Analysts said that the video was particularly damaging and that the accuser came across more credibly than he did in courtroom testimony.

The trial seemed to take a toll on Jackson.

While he jumped atop an SUV and danced for cheering fans after his arraignment, his behaviour became decidedly more subdued as the trial progressed.

Throughout the trial, Jackson suffered a series of ailments, including a bad back and the flu.

He was admonished at the beginning of the trial for arriving late and then arrived later in the week clad in his pyjamas.

Even Monday after he was cleared of all charges, a gaunt-looking Jackson, who appeared to have lost weight during the ordeal, seemed frail and fatigued as the four-month long trial came to an end.

With a report from CTV's Graham Richardson
 

Amos Stevens

New Member
Guess we have to post the BAD news along with the good :(

Can't believe he even got off the charge on giving the boy liqour!
 

MJ fan

Im bad!
What the hel! He's been found innocent and ppl are still sayin hes guilty! Anyway it dont matter now cause he's a free man as he should be :D
 

GlimmerMan

Huge Member
He's as guilty as OJ Simpson. In fact - he's as guilty as Saddam Hussain!

Fu*king crazy bleached ridiculous-looking freakshow motherfu*ker!

If I saw OJ walking in the street I'd go up to him and say: "Hey man, I hear you're getting married again", and OJ would say: "Oh yeah?" and I'd go: "Yeah - I hear you're going to have another STAB at it."

Haha.

GMan
 

Flashgalaxy

Cupcake
i can't imagine how someone who has composed some of the most beautiful and inspirational songs be guilty of such crimes??? It's the ignorant people who are easily seduced by the media and make snap judgments without even knowing the true Michael Jackson. I am disgusted by those people out there who conjure up fairytales just to cash in on MJ's wealth... MJ has done so much for the world at large and the music industry.
 

TDWoj

Administrator
Staff member
Jackson jurors say they found no 'smoking gun'

CTV.ca News Staff

Although jurors acquitted Michael Jackson of all charges of molesting a 13-year-old boy, some of them say they're not convinced the pop star has never molested a child.

Jury foreman Paul Rodriguez said jurors were "very troubled" that Jackson admitted he had sleepovers with children in his bed.

In an interview on CNN's "Larry King Live," Juror No. 1, identified later as Raymond Hultman, said he believes Jackson "probably has molested boys."

"I can't believe that this man could sleep in the same bedroom for 365 straight days and not do something more than just watch television and eat popcorn," he told King.

"I mean, that doesn't make sense to me. But that doesn't make him guilty of the charges that were presented in this case and that's where we had to make our decision."

But jurors said at a post-verdict news conference Monday night that, after more than seven days of deliberations, they agreed prosecutors simply hadn't proved their case beyond a reasonable doubt.

The foreman said as jurors, they had to base their verdicts on the facts of the case -- not "our beliefs or our own personal thoughts."

Their decisions were based on two things: the prosecution couldn't prove its case; and they didn't like the accuser's mother.

Juror No. 5, a retired widow, said she was put off when the mother snapped her fingers at the jurors from the stand.

"I disliked it intensely when she snapped her fingers at us," said the retired widow. "That's when I thought, 'Don't snap your fingers at me, lady.'"

Juror No. 2 said he felt the mother singled him out because he was a fellow Hispanic.

"She looked at me and snapped her fingers a few times and she says, 'You know how our culture is,' and winks at me. I thought, 'No, that's not the way our culture is.'"

No 'smoking gun'

Jurors also said they had trouble with the prosecution's timeline of events.

According to prosecutors, the pop star molested the teenage boy while dealing with the fallout from a television documentary -- one that prompted outrage over sleepovers Jackson held at Neverland ranch, and over footage that showed him holding hands with the boy.

"The timeline was really a concern," said juror No. 3, a 50-year-old woman.

Jurors also said they found no "smoking gun" in the evidence.

"We expected probably better evidence ... something that was a little more convincing, and it just wasn't there,'' said juror No. 10.

Steven Skurka, Canada AM's legal analyst, said there was one key piece of evidence that the jury addressed last night -- the fact that the family first took their case to civil lawyer Larry Feldman.

"Remember this family went to lawyer Larry Feldman, who had been involved in the earlier lawsuit and civil settlement with Michael Jackson. They went to that lawyer weeks before they even went to police to make their complaint. To me, that was just a bombshell in the evidence."

Feldman, under cross-examination by the defense earlier in the trial, said he had never made statements to third parties about the credibility of the accuser's mother, or about the veracity of their claims.

Rodriguez said the jury took only two votes. They divided up tasks and used their notes to follow the timeline of events.

In a statement that the judge read in court after the verdict, jurors asked to be allowed to return to "our private lives as anonymously as we came."
 

TDWoj

Administrator
Staff member
Something I'm wondering about - doesn't the American justice system have something called "double jeopardy" meaning that an accused, once acquitted, can't be tried for the same charge again? In the first posting, it said the district attorney was planning to refile charges. But Jackson was acquitted, so how can the DA do that?
 

Lollipop

Banned
TDWoj said:
Something I'm wondering about - doesn't the American justice system have something called "double jeopardy" meaning that an accused, once acquitted, can't be tried for the same charge again? In the first posting, it said the district attorney was planning to refile charges. But Jackson was acquitted, so how can the DA do that?

Yes they do!! He would have to come up with different charges and have a grand jury indict him!! I don't know how he would be able to do this!!

It is ironic!
Robert Blake
OJ Simpson
Michael Jackson
 

Lollipop

Banned
Flashgalaxy said:
i can't imagine how someone who has composed some of the most beautiful and inspirational songs be guilty of such crimes??? It's the ignorant people who are easily seduced by the media and make snap judgments without even knowing the true Michael Jackson. I am disgusted by those people out there who conjure up fairytales just to cash in on MJ's wealth... MJ has done so much for the world at large and the music industry.

It is widely believe that this family was after money!! And were not creditably!
The mother had the boy's take acting class to help them on the stand!
Michael is a very talented artist and has done some very good things!! He should have never given that interview about how he liked to share his bed!
But the Rev Jessie Jackson has told him he is going to have to change his way!
This behavior leads to questioning what is going on!!
He set this fire himself!
 

hofmae

New Member
Lollipop said:
It is widely believe that this family was after money!! And were not creditably!
The mother had the boy's take acting class to help them on the stand!
Michael is a very talented artist and has done some very good things!! He should have never given that interview about how he liked to share his bed!
But the Rev Jessie Jackson has told him he is going to have to change his way!
This behavior leads to questioning what is going on!!
He set this fire himself!

Exactly...
 

david1550

New Member
if he was smart he will not allow any more kids to come over to his house because if he does this will happen again and again and again
 
GlimmerMan said:
He's as guilty as OJ Simpson. In fact - he's as guilty as Saddam Hussain!

crazy bleached ridiculous-looking freakshow

If I saw OJ walking in the street I'd go up to him and say: "Hey man, I hear you're getting married again", and OJ would say: "Oh yeah?" and I'd go: "Yeah - I hear you're going to have another STAB at it."

Haha.

GMan

LOL

Funny stuff, Glimmer.
 

Amos Stevens

New Member
The next victims TD they can refile charges...and maybe when Jackson ain't so popular any more he will actually be convicted
 

Mason

Well-Known Member
Amos Stevens said:
and maybe when Jackson ain't so popular any more he will actually be convicted

Nono he will just offer them a ride in the waterslide in his little never never land park or whatever it is called. :D :D
 

Serena

Administrator
That's just the way it is at this site, GlimmerMan. Sorry, but we're just doing the best job we can with the guidelines we've been given. Any problems, take them up with Craig. Thanks.
 

MJ fan

Im bad!
It seems like some ppl on this site are evil haha and cant accept that mj is innocent and continue to bash him! What kinda ppl are u? Making fun of him like that! Ive read some really bad things about him on here and it makes me sick! Think of the life he's had...He was basically forced into becoming famous and had a bad time growing up as a result. And the reason he's had so much surgery is cause his dad always used to call him ugly and it screwed his head up! 1 last thing he's not bleached! He has a skin discease and it's been PROVEN. Cant everyone just see him as a great artist now he's been cleared?
 

mikek7316

Engorged Member
TDWoj said:
Something I'm wondering about - doesn't the American justice system have something called "double jeopardy" meaning that an accused, once acquitted, can't be tried for the same charge again? In the first posting, it said the district attorney was planning to refile charges. But Jackson was acquitted, so how can the DA do that?

This is what the story you are referring to said about refiling charges:

"'There have been reports that the main prosecutor, Sneddon, has plans to refile charges right away,' Richardson reported earlier."

This is a statement by somebody they interviewed, not really a statement from the news service. This Richardson guy must not know what he's talking about, because we do have protection against double jeopardy in this country. Even if Jacko now admits he is guilty of all 10 charges, he cannot be prosecuted again. He could however be prosecuted in the future for other instances of child molestation on other children.
 
Top