Short Article on Sony DTV Premieres

bwana-beast

Active Member
Found this short article in a video trade journal that discusses Sony's action DTV program from the past few years fueled by multiple releases from stars like Seagal, Van Damme and Lundgren:

Sony develops DVD premieres with notable names
By Wendy Wilson and Laurence Lerman -- Video Business, 2/15/2008

FEB. 15 |
Sony has quietly developed a notable business bringing out DVD premiere action titles featuring stars that graced theatrical marquees in the late ’80s and ’90s, including Dolph Lundgren, Steven Seagal and Jean-Claude Van Damme.

The trio has continued to kick ass for Sony into the new millennium. Seagal has locked and loaded in some dozen Sony DVD premieres in the past five years, including The Foreigner (2003), Out of Reach (2004), Submerged (2005), Attack Force (2006), Urban Justice (2007) and the upcoming Pistol Whipped,due March 4.

Van Damme’s fists have flown in seven others, beginning with 2001’s The Order and up through 2007’s Until Death and the soon-to-be-released The Shepherd, also due March 4, while Lundgren has let loose in The Mechanik (2005), last month’s Missionary Man and the upcoming Diamond Dogs, due in April.

The studio’s ongoing relationship with these stars—run in large part out of Sony’s in-house production and acquisitions label, Stage 6 Films—creates product that appeals to an established niche fan base in the U.S. and abroad. Stage 6 releases between 10 and 15 films each year.

Jennifer Anderson, VP of marketing for Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, said that recent action titles such as Missionary Man, starring Lundgren, or Pistol Whipped, with Seagal, are still securing millions for production costs because, quite simply, they still sell.

“We have a strong rental presence and they definitely perform well for us in that category, but we’re also investing a lot of time in deciding how they’re going to do at a Wal-Mart, a Best Buy, a Circuit City and a Trans World,” she said. “Rental is definitely a significant portion of the business for us, but so is sell-through.”

According to Rentrak, Seagal, Van Damme and Lundgren films released since 2005 have generated about $90 million combined on consumer spending on rentals and purchases. All but three of the 16 titles released in that time period were from Sony.

“I have an instantly recognizable face, and I suppose if people see someone they recognize in one of these titles, they’re more apt to pick it up,” Dolph Lundgren told VB in a recent interview.

In addition to starring in the Sony DVD premieres Missionary Man and Diamond Dogs (due in April), Lundgren directed and co-produced the pair, along with directing 2006’s The Mechanik, also distributed by Sony.

“You get a little more latitude and a little more ability to get things financed,” said Lundgren, who puts the cost of each picture at “$5 million to $7 million” with a shooting schedule of about four weeks. “The risk and budget aren’t as severe, but you do want to satisfy the fans and distributors.”

Video premiere actioners with proven talent are consistent sellers abroad as well.

“These titles help round out our product slate and hit the genre sweet spot for the core DVD buyer,” said Alison Biggers, senior VP of international marketing for Sony. “They are perfect to feed the rental market in territories like Brazil. Because of the steady flow, we are able to develop ongoing targeted consumer programs like our Web sites for Fight Factory Films in the U.K. and Planet Action in Germany.”

Taken together, these contemporary video premieres become a new catalog for the company, one that functions in the same ways—and with the same potential for profit—as catalog product with a theatrical release.

“When a new one comes out, it’s a new opportunity for the catalog, whether it’s a re-price or being merchandised in a particular way with retailers,” Anderson said.

Publicity is key to the success of these video premieres. With limited marketing dollars and little or no theatrical exposure, studios rely on the involvement of the talent to help promote their projects in the press. Lundgren did satellite radio interviews and several interviews for online publications for Missionary Man.

Sony is looking ahead to the future of this niche now, developing relationships with actors who enjoy a loyal fan base and name recognition with the potential staying power as a video premiere hero. March 18 release Conspiracy, an action vehicle for Val Kilmer, is one title Sony’s home entertainment team will be watching with interest.

“We’re always looking for who can be our next action star and we’re excited to have our next release with Val,” Anderson said.
 

Kotegashi

Master Of Disaster
Staff member
Interesting, good find. Looks like they made cash-cows out of Vandamme Seagal and Lundgren.

They are still in business because they sell well, but are kept in the dtv market because then they can produce more movies in a short time with low budget and a solid return on investment for the studio.

This will probably mean Seagal will be in business for a few more years.

Peace
 

bwana-beast

Active Member
Dtv = $

Agreed. As long as these stars have enough impact to generate quick profit from DTV movies, finding work is not a problem. With the dynamics of the video market having changed in the past decade or two from just another revenue stream for theatrical releases to its current state of being almost a separate film industry (so few films are released to theaters anymore on a wide, or even regional basis), there is much money to be made on a modest investment with minimal risk. Unless one has major studio backing and budget, theatrical release simply adds the the budget and risk.
 

supertom

Disgruntled fan!
don wilkey;183235 said:
In this article, Sony ought to have placed Steven Seagal's before vandamme and lundgren

I'm not so sure about that one after all Dolph came first out the blocks this year with MM, but aside from anything else, MM pulled in more than any Seagal film since BOTB, which is 5 years old now. I think after a string of such turkeys by Stevo (though his last two are now pulling him in the right direction) he's got to work harder to be considered the DTV action king. As the article mentions, he'll have more competition now with Val Kilmer, but also guys like Cuba Gooding Jr doing a lot of DTV flicks. Even guys like Morgan Freeman and John Cusack have released DTV films recently.
 

steeven

Banned
supertom;183242 said:
I'm not so sure about that one after all Dolph came first out the blocks this year with MM, but aside from anything else, MM pulled in more than any Seagal film since BOTB, which is 5 years old now. I think after a string of such turkeys by Stevo (though his last two are now pulling him in the right direction) he's got to work harder to be considered the DTV action king. As the article mentions, he'll have more competition now with Val Kilmer, but also guys like Cuba Gooding Jr doing a lot of DTV flicks. Even guys like Morgan Freeman and John Cusack have released DTV films recently.

supertom,
thats an interesting point. Steven Seagal has definately jumped from the big screen to dvd screens in his acting career. Maybe, there won't even be a need for big theaters in future to watch one's favorite actors? I wonder if this is the reason for Steven Seagal and others resorting to the dvd format? Could it be that big theater screens are becoming outdated???
 

supertom

Disgruntled fan!
steeven;183249 said:
supertom,
thats an interesting point. Steven Seagal has definately jumped from the big screen to dvd screens in his acting career. Maybe, there won't even be a need for big theaters in future to watch one's favorite actors? I wonder if this is the reason for Steven Seagal and others resorting to the dvd format? Could it be that big theater screens are becoming outdated???

Box office receipts aren't exactly at their highest really. They kind of slumped with the advent of DVD anyway- plus home cinema equipment is now reasonablly affordable. Aside from anything you can release a DVD with very little cost if necassary, and as such, as long as you don't spend too much on the shooting budget, it's easy to make a tidy profit. The other thing is, studios assume that people no longer want to go out of their way and over to their nearest theatre to watch a Seagal movie, or a Van Damme movie. The problem is for an action movie in the theatre, you need bang for the buck. You've got to be spending a mininum of maybe 15-20million on the picture itself. Then to release it- with prints and advertising, on reasonably good scale release of 1000+ screens, another 5 million (probably more). Right then the film would probably need to make over 25 million to break even in the states, but more likely I'd guess you'd be looking at 30 million (that's before you take into consideration paying back borrowed money, people getting their share). A Seagal film would 99% certainly LOSE money on a theatrical run- and then the DVD release has to make up that shortfall. With these action guys it's got to be all or nothing really. It's not worth doing a limited release. DVD gives the product straight to the customer, straight on the high street. You can producer enough DVD's to satisfy demand comfortably and without spending much. Stallone came back successfully with Rocky and Rambo, both of which had opening weekends of around 17-18million. That was in part down to the name of Stallone, but mostly down to the franchises. Seagal, even with his best money spinner, Under Siege, would be lucky to get half that opening weekend. And his weekly drop offs would be huge. We'd be talking less intake than HPD, and a lot less than Exit Wounds for sure.

Personally I'd love to see the action guys back on the big screen. Perhaps with the didgital age now in, and digital projection, it'll be possible. films shown on digital is far cheaper than old school film cans, which cost about $3000 per print (some cinemas may have 2 prints and then multiply that by 2000 screens- it's a lot of money). In a few years time most cinemas should be digital so smaller films will find it easier to get theatircal or wider theatrical distribution. Still I think if the profitability of DTV action films stays like it is, then there won't be any pressing need for studios to push Seagal, and the like, back on the big screen. It's just big business at the moment. DVD has salvaged a hell of a lot of flops, which in retrospect would have been better off not shelling out for an unsuccessful theatrical run. Chronicles Of Riddick for example- there's been talk now of doing another film, but a much smaller budget, on par with Pitch Black- possibly DTV. We also get a lot of DTV sequals now.
 

rastafari

Well-Known Member
supertom;183261 said:
Box office receipts aren't exactly at their highest really. They kind of slumped with the advent of DVD anyway- plus home cinema equipment is now reasonablly affordable. Aside from anything you can release a DVD with very little cost if necassary, and as such, as long as you don't spend too much on the shooting budget, it's easy to make a tidy profit. The other thing is, studios assume that people no longer want to go out of their way and over to their nearest theatre to watch a Seagal movie, or a Van Damme movie. The problem is for an action movie in the theatre, you need bang for the buck. You've got to be spending a mininum of maybe 15-20million on the picture itself. Then to release it- with prints and advertising, on reasonably good scale release of 1000+ screens, another 5 million (probably more). Right then the film would probably need to make over 25 million to break even in the states, but more likely I'd guess you'd be looking at 30 million (that's before you take into consideration paying back borrowed money, people getting their share). A Seagal film would 99% certainly LOSE money on a theatrical run- and then the DVD release has to make up that shortfall. With these action guys it's got to be all or nothing really. It's not worth doing a limited release. DVD gives the product straight to the customer, straight on the high street. You can producer enough DVD's to satisfy demand comfortably and without spending much. Stallone came back successfully with Rocky and Rambo, both of which had opening weekends of around 17-18million. That was in part down to the name of Stallone, but mostly down to the franchises. Seagal, even with his best money spinner, Under Siege, would be lucky to get half that opening weekend. And his weekly drop offs would be huge. We'd be talking less intake than HPD, and a lot less than Exit Wounds for sure.

Personally I'd love to see the action guys back on the big screen. Perhaps with the didgital age now in, and digital projection, it'll be possible. films shown on digital is far cheaper than old school film cans, which cost about $3000 per print (some cinemas may have 2 prints and then multiply that by 2000 screens- it's a lot of money). In a few years time most cinemas should be digital so smaller films will find it easier to get theatircal or wider theatrical distribution. Still I think if the profitability of DTV action films stays like it is, then there won't be any pressing need for studios to push Seagal, and the like, back on the big screen. It's just big business at the moment. DVD has salvaged a hell of a lot of flops, which in retrospect would have been better off not shelling out for an unsuccessful theatrical run. Chronicles Of Riddick for example- there's been talk now of doing another film, but a much smaller budget, on par with Pitch Black- possibly DTV. We also get a lot of DTV sequals now.

i agree but theres been recent action films in cinemas with small budgets

CRANK had a 10M budget and looked good

TRANSPORTER had a 20M budget and again had loads of action

SHOOT EM UP had a 15M budget and it looked impressive

you dont always need a big budget to shoot good action(roel renie shot some great stuff in 17 days)
 

steeven

Banned
rastafari;183271 said:
i agree but theres been recent action films in cinemas with small budgets

CRANK had a 10M budget and looked good

TRANSPORTER had a 20M budget and again had loads of action

SHOOT EM UP had a 15M budget and it looked impressive

you dont always need a big budget to shoot good action(roel renie shot some great stuff in 17 days)

another good point rastafari. Steven Seagal has been proven successful business man in the field of film budgeting.
 
Top