Steven Seagal sued for $14 million by production company

Status
Not open for further replies.

jhogan

New Member
Of course you realise that Seagal hasn't had any new films announced in some time. All his films are done. Since Nu Image and these folks were a big supplier of his films, one wonders whether his days of DTV releases are done.

Seagal was making them as fast as he could for as much money as he can (I really don't think they were 4-5 million a pop, though) because he knew they would end soon because they were so crappy.
 

Purplelotus1

Active Member
jhogan said:
Of course you realise that Seagal hasn't had any new films announced in some time. All his films are done. Since Nu Image and these folks were a big supplier of his films, one wonders whether his days of DTV releases are done.

Seagal was making them as fast as he could for as much money as he can (I really don't think they were 4-5 million a pop, though) because he knew they would end soon because they were so crappy.
Yeah I think he's finished in the movies.
 

suziwong

Administrator
Staff member
Another article and notes !!!

Producers accuse Seagal of breach of contract
A suit for $14 million in damages says the actor caused filming delays.
June 10, 2005
By Robert W. Welkos


The producers of two Steven Seagal films now in postproduction — "Today You Die" and "Mercenary" — have sued the international action star for breach of contract, claiming he cost them millions of dollars by consistently failing to arrive on the set on time, engaging in constant script rewrites, making unapproved departures from the set and allowing his entourage to interfere with the work of the film crews.

Seagal's attorney fired back, calling the allegations "fabricated and ridiculous" and said Seagal is still owed $830,000.
"My client did not want to do another movie with them," said Los Angeles attorney Martin Singer. "But he had a contract. So if they felt he was so bad they couldn't work with him, they could have said, 'Fine, let's not do it.' If he was late, how come they finished it on time and under budget?"

The legal tit-for-tat stems from a lawsuit filed Monday in Los Angeles County Superior Court by Kill Master Productions Inc. and Nu Image Inc., alleging breach of contract by the actor. The suit seeks at least $14 million in damages from Seagal, Steamroller Productions and Luminocity Media Inc.

The suit contends Seagal caused production delays totaling 22 hours on "Today You Die." On the final day of the shoot, Dec. 22, the suit says, Seagal left the set without the producers' approval more than five hours early to attend a dinner he described as having "national security implications." He also repeatedly held nonproduction meetings during his workday, including meetings "to buy canines for his personal use," the suit added.

Singer claims the lawsuit was "filed to avoid paying Steven the money they knew he was owed."

"We'll take it to a jury and let a jury decide, in the event it is not resolved," said Charles M. Coate, attorney for the plaintiffs.

----------------------------------------

suzi
 

TDWoj

Administrator
Staff member
So, what are the odds, do you think, that "Mercenary" and "Today You Die" are actually going to be released, given the lawsuit-counter lawsuits?
 

suziwong

Administrator
Staff member
TDWoj said:
So, what are the odds, do you think, that "Mercenary" and "Today You Die" are actually going to be released, given the lawsuit-counter lawsuits?


ggguuullllllllllppppppppp !!! I guess you are right !!!!

suzi
 

Nick

The Writer
I think Today You Die had the potential to be his best Direct To Video Release yet. But when I read this line I lost all faith for this project "...routinely rewrote and changed scripts on the set”. Even if these films do not get Released they will become his sort of infamous talked about projects that never saw the light of day. Through I am quite sure if they did I wouldn't be too impressed.
 

aikidoboynj

"Lookin fit Nelson"
National Security Reasons....hmmm riiight, not rubbish- you guys honestly think that his DTV movies are as good as his other movie (there not even on the same scale) If you cant see that they are rubbish than you might just be blinded by the Seagal World Order. Well i was going to write more but I have to get going I have to go to subway- its a matter of national security. DUURR
 

TDWoj

Administrator
Staff member
There seem to be two kind of Seagal fans, each with various degrees of devotion.

The first seems to be, "any movie Seagal makes is a good movie". These are the fans that are just happy to see him working. Bad scripts, worse direction, no-name supporting actors, stories that are poorly written and make no sense, these are all irrelevant - if Steven is in a movie, that's the most important thing.

The second seems to be "we know Seagal can do better, why isn't he?" These are the fans that want to see HIM - him doing his own fighting, him saying his own lines, him not being doubled, him in shape and not looking like he's just come off a three-day bender, him in a movie with good, snappy dialogue, a good story, with a strong cast of supporting characters, good special effects, good production values, a good director who knows how to make him work and do his best.

This isn't to say one type of fan is superior to the other. But consider the consequences of being fan of Type 1. If any movie Seagal makes is a good movie, then people will continue to buy and rent his films regardless of their quality, and brush aside the poor scripts, bad direction, dubbing, doubling, lack of fight scenes where Steven does his own fighting for longer than 5 seconds, and complete lack of interest in what he's doing even when it is him on screen. If what Kcs says is true (and I'm finding it hard to believe), his dtv movies make money. If they make money, what's his motivation for doing better? None - none whatsoever.

Fans of Type 2 don't have impossibly high expectations, contrary to what they have been accused of. Fans of Type 2 do have some level of expectation - if Steven is in a movie, then ALL of him should be in the movie - his voice, his fighting stunts, even his own body. Some want him in fighting trim; some think it doesn't matter as long as he's still able to do his own work. Fans of Type 2 recognize that the poor scripts, poor direction, poor production values, substandard effects and a supporting cast of no-name actors are all factors that are working towards the death of Seagal's movie career.

I hate to point out the obvious, but what studio is going to want to touch him with a bargepole, now that there are these lawsuits pending? It doesn't matter who's right or wrong in this case - the damage has been done. His reputation, already bad in the movie industry, has now been completely shredded. No one is going to want to work with him, or pay him 3 million dollars per movie, even if the allegations aren't true. The allegations have been made, they are out there, and the industry, unfortunately, is one that thrives on gossip, not fact - and there's his past history of being difficult to work with, as well.

It doesn't really matter on which side the fans come down on, with regards to the lawsuit-counter lawsuit. The death knell of Steven's movie career is tolling. It's a no-win situation. If he loses the lawsuit, his reputation and credibility will be completely shot, and no studio will want to have anything to do with him. If he wins his lawsuit, no studio will want to have anything to do with him for fear of being sued.
 

suziwong

Administrator
Staff member
TDWoj said:
I hate to point out the obvious, but what studio is going to want to touch him with a bargepole, now that there are these lawsuits pending? It doesn't matter who's right or wrong in this case - the damage has been done. His reputation, already bad in the movie industry, has now been completely shredded. No one is going to want to work with him, or pay him 3 million dollars per movie, even if the allegations aren't true. The allegations have been made, they are out there, and the industry, unfortunately, is one that thrives on gossip, not fact - and there's his past history of being difficult to work with, as well.

It doesn't really matter on which side the fans come down on, with regards to the lawsuit-counter lawsuit. The death knell of Steven's movie career is tolling. It's a no-win situation. If he loses the lawsuit, his reputation and credibility will be completely shot, and no studio will want to have anything to do with him. If he wins his lawsuit, no stuidio will want to have anything to do with him for fear of being sued.

Really bad situation... But you can be right...:(

I hope we have wrong !!!

suzi
 

suziwong

Administrator
Staff member
Update !!

Seagal Sues Nu Image Over 'Mercenary'
Fri, Jun 10, 2005, 10:06 AM PT

LOS ANGELES (Zap2it.com) - After feeling "Under Siege" from a "frivolous" lawsuit, action star Steven Seagal has hit back, suing Nu Image for fraud, breach of contract and intentional interference with a contract in regards to the feature film "Mercenary."
The complaint, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, alleges that "In an effort to harass, cheat and intimidate Seagal, Nu Image, which financed 'Mercenary,' has refused to pay Steven Seagal $835,000 he is owed, despite the fact that he traveled to South Africa and rendered all acting services required under his contract."

-----------

for your information

suzi
 

GlimmerMan

Huge Member
TD - good post. I reckon it can be displayed as a mathematical equation, which my warped mind will spend the rest of the night attempting to create...
 

suziwong

Administrator
Staff member
I guess this is different the others: (some details)

From E.Online:

Seagal Marked for Suit

by Josh Grossberg
Jun 9, 2005, 6:30 PM PT

Steven Seagal is under siege.


This time, the fading action hero is facing attack from a Hollywood film company, which is suing Seagal for $14 million for allegedly slowing down production on two movies.

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of Kill Master Productions and sales agent Nu Image, claims the 54-year-old Seagal delayed shooting on the action flicks Today You Die and Mercenary by routinely showing up late for work and leaving early.

Per the complaint, the onetime box-office champ famed for kicking butt in such high-octane thrillers as 1992's Under Siege and 1996's Executive Decision arrived 45 minutes late for filming on Today You Die and checked out three and a half hours before he was supposed to.

Additionally, the suit says that Seagal made changes to the script, including dialogue, without permission. He purportedly turned up in South Africa for production on Mercenary in April and May only when producers threatened to sue him, and he allegedly invited an entourage onto the set that disrupted the film crew.

"Seagal and his entourage continually harassed, intimidated and threatened the production and members of the production team with requests and demands that were inappropriate, outrageous or not contractually required," according to court papers.

Such behavior, the plaintiffs say, will cost both companies millions of dollars in delays and reshoots.

But Seagal's camp says it's the producers who crossed the line.

"Those claims are not only with out merit they're ridiculous," Seagal's attorney, Marty Singer, tells E! Online. "The suit was filed only because he was going to pursue claims against them."

Singer says the lawsuit "was a preemptive strike [because] my client made claims against them during the shooting that they were not honoring his creative rights." Singer says such rights included rewriting the script.


Seagal himself is now out for justice.

The actor filed his own lawsuit Thursday against Kill Master and Nu Image, alleging fraud, breach of contract, and intentional interference with a contract.

"In an effort to harass, cheat and intimidate Seagal, Nu Image, which financed Mercenary, has refused to pay Steven Seagal $835,000 he is owed, despite the fact that he traveled to South Africa and rendered all acting services required under his contract," the complaint reads.

Singer says that Mercenary was supposed to have a budget of $14 million, but the companies withheld between $5 million and $7 million, hurting the production quality and potentially harming the film's theatrical release.

"My client was notified that South African criminal authorities were conducting an investigation into money allegedly listed that didn't go into this movie," Singer adds.

Singer also says that, after Mercenary wrapped, the producers expressed interest in working with Seagal again--even though they failed to pay him the aforementioned $835,000 in wages.

"[Nu Image's] suit was filed to try and make Steven spend money to collect money he was owed, and it's obvious the film was completed on time and under budget," the attorney says.


After filing its suit, Nu Image did offer to pony up about 80 percent of what it owed Seagal, approximately $650,000.

Singer also disputes the allegation of an entourage run amok, saying there was "no entourage per se," just the director, Don FauntLeRoy, whom Seagal relied on to inform him when to show up for work. According to the lawyer, the director is also considering legal action for violating his creative rights.

Charles M. Coate, the lawyer for Nu Image and Kill Master, was not immediately available for comment.

While Seagal isn't as popular as he used to be, he continues to work steadily, if under the radar. Since his touted 2002 comeback, Half-Past Dead, failed to live up to expectations at the box office, he has been consigned to several largely forgettable straight-to-video flicks.

That's a far cry from his heyday, when he made such hit films as Above the Law (1988), Hard to Kill (1990), Out for Justice (1991) and On Deadly Ground (1994).


----- suzi
 

Nick

The Writer
I am a Type 2 Fan.

P.S I wanted to reply to the hilarity of the doughnut comment but it seems like it was deleted.
 
Someone said his movie career may be over. I don't think so. Apparently Steve's in talks with HPD producer Elie Samaha to topline a couple of his new companies' movies.
 

TDWoj

Administrator
Staff member
gunslinger said:
Someone said his movie career may be over. I don't think so. Apparently Steve's in talks with HPD producer Elie Samaha to topline a couple of his new companies' movies.

Talk about out of the frying pan and into the fire... you do know that Elie Samaha was convicted of fraud which is why Franchise Pictures went toes up?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top