• This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.

Van Damme looks terrible!!!!

Mama San

Administrator
#1
I have never seen him look so bad!
He will soon be 47 years old. Steven is a good
8 years older than JCVD but he looks 10 years
older than Steven.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Until Death
2007
Millennium Films and Signature Entertainment
Starring: Jean-Claude van Damme,
Stephen Rea, Selina Giles (II)
Directed by: Simon Fellows
Produced by: Moshe Diamant, Rudy Cohen, Daphne Lerner

"A dirty cop who is nearly killed in a gunfight emerges from a coma
months later, getting a second change for revenge and redemption."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not a bad film. Sometimes a little confusing but interesting.

God bless,
Mama san
 
#4
I was going to say that but thought I might get banned again, haha!

Wasn't he a junkhead in Until Death? That could be why he looked terrible?
 
#6
Folks, he looks like that because it's for his character. He plays a drugged out, dirty cop for the first half of the movie and he plays it very well. If you find pics of him in the later half of the film, you'll see that he still looks good for his age. Sorry, but there's just no comparing Seagal and Van Damme in terms of health...Van Damme is far healthier in my opinion.
 
#9
Seagal's face looks better minus the double chin. Van Damme does look older though, drug abuse speeds up the ageing process. Look at some of Van Damme's recent pictures(ie. Bollywood apperance). He does not look 46, he clearly looks older. But he is deffinitely in much better physical shape than Seagal
 
#12
Van Damme is in perfect shape, he looked the way he looked in Until Death because of the role he played.
You can rip on Van Damme how much you want, but the fact is that he's in good shape for a guy in his late fourties.

Seagal wished he looked as healty when he had the age Van Dammes has now.

Oh, lookie here, he looks so bad...:rolleyes:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=CPDGdJSTbyI
 
#13
I must say he looks great, although if you look on yahoo images there are some pics of him up close where he did not look so great. Pics from the Bollywood awards and a few others. I wonder if he has had some work done?
 
#16
Like JCVD is such an perfect guy ..nonsense i dont see all his fans mentioning all the bad things he has done ..of course not
god forbid so to all those fan sof his that think he is picture perfect wake up its got abit blurry..
 
#17
GlimmerMan;175895 said:
I was going to say that but thought I might get banned again, haha!

Wasn't he a junkhead in Until Death? That could be why he looked terrible?
Don't be afraid of that, we should be able to voice our opinion.
Even if it isn't liked by some administrators.

And yes he played a junkhead in Until Death, that's why he looked so horrible.
 
#18
Dmoj;175916 said:
Seagal's face looks better minus the double chin. Van Damme does look older though, drug abuse speeds up the ageing process. Look at some of Van Damme's recent pictures(ie. Bollywood apperance). He does not look 46, he clearly looks older. But he is deffinitely in much better physical shape than Seagal
I wish people wouldn't keep comparing other actors to Steven. what's the point of it? Steven is Steven and anybody else is anybody else, end of!!
 
#19
ORANGATUANG;175919 said:
Thanks for the pics Mama san ...looks like some havent seen the recent pics of Steven he has lost weight at least he aint an scrawny sod...
He's beautiful, whatever his weight. And why is that other actor being discussed on this forum? This is Steven's space!!!
 

fakeshemp

Hard To Kill
#20
Van Damme looks fantastic for his age. I'm 41 and I can only dream of being in the sort of shape he's in. As for how he looked in Until Death, he was supposed to look awful as others have already pointed out.