Let's just go with 25, not Top 25, or else I would be disappointed:
http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20153598,00.html
http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20153598,00.html
NCS;179518 said:That list was rubbish - imagine placing Seagal only at number 24 - he should have been at least at 5 - he is a true action hero - one who can really fight and really shoot unlike Damon who poses as one - and where is Van Damme and Norris and Lundgren and all the other true stars who can really fight - I didn't even recognise some of the people that were in there.
NCS;179518 said:That list was rubbish - imagine placing Seagal only at number 24 - he should have been at least at 5 - he is a true action hero - one who can really fight and really shoot unlike Damon who poses as one - and where is Van Damme and Norris and Lundgren and all the other true stars who can really fight - I didn't even recognise some of the people that were in there.
Nassau Mike;179535 said:Keanu Reeves, Matt Damon and Uma Thurman are some of the greatest action heroes? None of them can fight.
Kotegashi;179552 said:So they can't fight? Maybe they don't have a martial arts background, but they endured a lot of training (some even months before shooting) to make the scenes look fluent and natural.
But this isn't a question about fighters, it is about action heroes.
Seagal is definitely there, so is Statham, Damon, Stallone, Schwarzenegger (retired), Van Damme, Chan, Li, Lee, Norris, Dacascos, Lundgren.
Peace
Whahahaha you can't mean this EW.com. I say one word: Unbelieveable!Mama san;179520 said:Van Damme, Norris and Lundgren! You're right, NCS! Where are they?
Bruce Lee #11 and Steven at #24? How absolutely ridiculous can anyone get?
Shall we not forget Tom Cruise? gun: Oh, brother!!) As for Keanu Reeves?
He does very well with wires! But.....Bruce Willis???? Come on!!!
On the list...maybe, but #1? Give me a break!!
That list is so screwed up they ought to chuch the whole thing and start all over again. Only this time have someone, compile a list, that knows what they are doing!!
God bless,
Mama san
Yes precisely, only M:I (part 1) was good.gunslinger;179593 said:What a joke!!!!!!!!!!!
M:I 3 was the easily the worst of the Imposssible series. (It was also the lowest grossing). The action scenes were also direct rip-offs from other movies - the escape of the villain was almost identical to the causeway chase from True Lies and the ending was identical to Dennis Hopper's death in Speed only without the blood and originality.
Bruce Willis once called Entertainment Weekly a joke. Now I know why.