BillyRayLancing said:Ill admit, i watch Steven Seagal films becasue i think the man is possibly the funniest man ever to grace the silver and video screens, from obvious stunt doubles to poor scripts his films have all the comedy qualitys. Howevers, Out Of Reach, from a movie goer view point, is terrible, from the fact Seagal has a stunt double play him in the very first scene to the fact he has a differant guy do his overdubs. Im a media student, and i can tell you this is bad filmaking, Steven Seagal has fallen to new lows, how he watches this film and thinks its good ill never know. At least in his ealry films he kicked arse.
BillyRayLancing said:I think hes the most unbothered actor ever, hes doesnt seem to mind that hes making films that are off a terrible quality!
BillyRayLancing said:The thing is, he must know that the movies hes making are poor. Its as if hes only in it for the money, which i think he may be. To be honest the only good script hes ever got is US - the rest are just too over done and play out more like comedys.
BillyRayLancing said:Ill admit, i watch Steven Seagal films becasue i think the man is possibly the funniest man ever to grace the silver and video screens, from obvious stunt doubles to poor scripts his films have all the comedy qualitys. Howevers, Out Of Reach, from a movie goer view point, is terrible, from the fact Seagal has a stunt double play him in the very first scene to the fact he has a differant guy do his overdubs. Im a media student, and i can tell you this is bad filmaking, Steven Seagal has fallen to new lows, how he watches this film and thinks its good ill never know. At least in his ealry films he kicked arse.
BillyRayLancing said:I mean all of his movies, their too Cliché, i mean, its solid action, but its still been done before, and in parts it plays out like a parody, in US he brought something new to the screen and i think thats why it did so well.
BillyRayLancing said:I think really, his early films were right for the time, i mean Stallone and Arnie were bringing out action classics at the time and Seagal kinda cashed in on that, with his hard hitting action. I mean in terms of martial arts, knowbodys brought anything new to the screen since Bruce Lee, mabye Jackie Chan with his stunts, but thats not really Martial Arts. Steven needs to realise that he can be a box office star if he stops taking himself too seriously, loses some weight and if he stops making obviously terrible movies just for the money.
Littledragon said:Jackie Chan was more than just stunts. Have you seen movies such as Drunken Master, The Young Master, Dragon Lord, Wheels On Meals, Dragons Forever, Snake In The Eagles Shadow. Jackie was more than just a stuntman.
BillyRayLancing said:Ill admit, i watch Steven Seagal films becasue i think the man is possibly the funniest man ever to grace the silver and video screens, from obvious stunt doubles to poor scripts his films have all the comedy qualitys. Howevers, Out Of Reach, from a movie goer view point, is terrible, from the fact Seagal has a stunt double play him in the very first scene to the fact he has a differant guy do his overdubs. Im a media student, and i can tell you this is bad filmaking, Steven Seagal has fallen to new lows, how he watches this film and thinks its good ill never know. At least in his ealry films he kicked arse.