Mason
Well-Known Member
just downloaded the voltage pictures TRAILER and now i m uploading on youtube![]()
Where did you download it ??
just downloaded the voltage pictures TRAILER and now i m uploading on youtube![]()
i dowloaded using firefox flashgot, ti's an extenesion of firefox that download flash video from everywhereWhere did you download it ??
i dowloaded using firefox flashgot, ti's an extenesion of firefox that download flash video from everywhere![]()
It's probably budgeted at $5-$6m?
It's 'advertising' budget is probably 3 or 4 times higher than the entire budget for A GOOD MAN (you are aware of that, I hope?) So it can obviously have more elaborate action sequences, etc.
So by that rationale, you *should* hate EXPENDABLES 3 then?
So you visited a topic entitled 'NEW SEAGAL FILM - A GOOD MAN' why exactly?
That's nice to know, but unless Germany are at the forefront of 'Time-Travel-Technology', I wouldn't think that anything Seagal does (in 2014) would interest you?
I'm not sure why you think the film looks cheap? The trailer shows a wide variety of locations, has explosions, helicopters, gunplay and (most importantly) fights. If this looks cheap to you, please advise me of any 'really expensive looking' movies that seagal has made in the last 10 years. In my opinion, A GOOD MAN looks more elaborate and spacious than any of his more recent efforts. I enjoyed MAXIMUM CONVICTION, but it essentially took place in an abandoned prison (and a bar) throughout it's 98 minute running time. Ironically (apart from the top flight supporting cast) UNDER SIEGE (probably Seagal's most popular movie) is set in the one location throughout, and looks extremely cheap in hindsight (despite the fact that it wasn't)
I'm all for a difference of opinion (and love a good debate) but your contradictory outlook (given your stance on "2014 Seagal") lends little weight to your comments (as you seem prejudiced from the outset) and makes me wonder why you visited *THIS* topic in particular (or at all?)
People around here would do well to remember that Seagal is (primarily) making low-budget non-theatrical movies. Comparing such movies to Hollywood blockbusters (with ten times the budget/resources) is a fruitless task, and likely not worth anyone's time (especially your own) or even the bandwidth required to physically type it out.
I pretty much enjoy most of Seagal's DTV movies (some more than his theatrical releases) and as long as the plot isn't too convoluted, the doubles/dubbing aren't overly intrusive, and the 'Sensei' is kicking ass...Then I couldn't care less about the budget or location (nor the date, his weight or the supporting cast) I think he's on a pretty solid run of good, well-made movies of recent...But that's just my opinion.....I'd like to hear *your* opinion, but sadly you've pretty much stifled it from the get-go?
So I guess you have no basic conception of what the word 'Prime' Means?Don´t you understand that Seagal´s prime is long over due to his massivs ego and increasing weight.
A tad rude (but par for the course)I don´t know how many hamburgers Seagal had eaten since "Above the Law" but his fighting is not half as impressive as it used to be. It´s not only his age, be honest to yourself.
Yet you must still watch them, in order to hate them?I hate all those Direct to DVD movies. They look cheap and the directors are bad as well.
OK, we get it...You like your 'men' to be slim and athletic (this isn't a 'dating site' you know?)"Above the Law" cost only 8 million but that was Seagal best acting movie, he was slim, in top form, charismatic, there were other good actors in the movie and above all a good director.
Eh?He should stop making movies unless he lost lots of weight and get a chance to be in a good movie.
By the way Seagal is ill. His Germany appearance was delayed to July 11th.
He should stop making movies unless he lost lots of weight and get a chance to be in a good movie.
By the way Seagal is ill. His Germany appearance was delayed to July 11th.
"If we give Seagal a sex-change, shorten his legs and give him a blonde wig...can we then call him Cynthia Rothrock?"
Lee Nicholson: I see you´re hardcore fan. Even his recent lousy movies are good for you...-OK....-enough said.
I contributed a lot the the forum and a lot for Seagal fans in general because I was the one who posted all the Steven Seagal interviews on the Arsenio Hall Show on YouTube and I got lots of gratitude in private messages for that as well. I own so much Seagal stuff that you can only dream of but I haven´t got the time to upload it.
For instance: Seagal appearances on David Letterman Show, on Jay Leno´s Tonight Show, I also have both Seagal appearances as a Oscar presenter on the Academy Awards(1995+1996) and much more.
You should accept other opinions but apparently you´re living in a dream word.
Seagal is no the great guy that you think he is. He molested more women in Hollywood than you know. Watch clips on YouTube with Claudia Jordan, Jenny McCartney etc....
He was named the worst Talk Show Host ever on Saturday Night Live due to his crazy personality. His reputation in Hollywood is worse than Honduras Soccer game in Brasil
Kotegashi: I´m German and according to lots of German newspapers Seagal postponed hisDuisburg appearance (Openng Planet Hollywood) due to his illness. He will be there on July 11th. You can believe me if I tell you this.
is the icing on the cakeI´m German and according to lots of German newspapers Seagal postponed hisDuisburg appearance (Openng Planet Hollywood) due to his illness. He will be there on July 11th. You can believe me if I tell you this.
"If we give Seagal a sex-change, shorten his legs and give him a blonde wig...can we then call him Cynthia Rothrock?"
Do you really think I´m interested what you think of me?
You can´t be serious. I don´t give a f..k what you think.
OK?
BecomeThat is Seagal and not the Seagal in 2014.
I just want to tell you that I´m still interested in Seagal
You can believe me if I tell you this.