Donnie said:Thanks for the varification there. I was sure it was something to do with Gump, but I was equally sure it was the year after he became a big star with 'Under Siege' in 1992, so I picked the latter. Doh. Thanks for the pic! Awesome.
I do remember when he handed them out he said "And one for you, one for you..." etc. So Seagal.
Shoot! The guy on the far left looks just likes James Brolin!!
marky96 said:Well I think he does need to hear 'put downs' from us, his true fans. I would not call them put downs merely critical advise but if 'put down' is the way you wish to phrase it then so be it, I just think it has a very negative vibe. If we don't tell him when something is not of acceptable quality, how will ne ever know to change? You are right that he gets 'put downs' from the media. On some occasions they are not acceptable or appropriate and we should support him. However more often than not recently, they are criticisms of his DTV efforts and I think that we should go along with those views in order that Seagal might realise he is making poor quality films and do something about it.
marky96 said:I am not a Seagal basher. I am a true fan unlike some people around here as I am able to be both objective and critical but in a positive way. Evidently you are one of those people who is not a true fan. I have tried to make serious points yet you, unable to comprehend their seriousness on any level other than a personal attack on Seagal, have followed the example set by others who disagree with me on this site. That is you resort to cheap and personal attacks on my character. As I have said before I don't think the colour in which somone writes is relevant to the seriousness of their point. I think you know this but cannot face up to the truth that lies at the centre of my posts. Therefore a cheap and frankly childish comment about my font colour is all you could muster. If you had been following some of the other threads more carefuly, you would know why I write in this colour.