yudansha said:JKD was designed by Bruce Lee as a way of practical self-defence. A system that would allow you to defend yourself on the streets in the most effective manner. Just so you know, samurais do not exist anymore. It's kind of like picking out a defence system against ninjas (who do not exist either ... and that art is even banned from Japan). Why would you need to defend yourself from a samurai? Do you see an army of those somewhere trying to defend their territory? Do you see people on the streets walking with swords and glaring at people like they're going to snatch purses off of the old ladies? And, today's armies (of any nation) can wipe out any 'army' of martial artists you can think of (samurais, etc.) ... so I found it kind of strange that you were taking defence to a samurai as a need that must be fulfilled. I'm not saying that JKD is the most effective or the 'greatest' martial arts system out there ... just commenting on what you said, so take it as you will.
I think my point was completely lost on you. Also, I'd like to ask what art it is that is band from Japan. I know Nimpo-jujitsu is still practiced in Japan (the art of the ninja), and so are many of the traditional forms of Budo including Daito Ryu aiki-jujitsu.
As far as Bruce Lee is concerned I know what his intent was with Jeet Kune Do, but he failed miserably. He didn’t even come up with anything that would rival what Yip Man was teaching at the time. Many techniques in Jeet Kune Do take three movements to complete what Wing Tsun will accomplish in one. I don’t think Bruce was that good. He was just the first one on the seen, as up to that point Orientals refused to teach outsiders. Bruce Lee was just a yesterday’s Rickson Gracie. If he had fought with his teacher, Yip Man, Bruce Lee would have loss hard. As I pointed out earlier Bruce didn’t complete his training, he never learned the high level techniques in Wing Tsun.
Now as far as the Samurai forms being meant to deal with other Samurai and Ninja, and that there aren’t any anymore… What’s your point? It seems to be reasonable to me if you can deal with multiple people armed and TRAINED with swords than you can handle multiple street punks armed with chains and crowbars.
As far as any army in the world being able to deal with an army of martial artists is concerned, I have to ask again: what your point is? Are we talking about mealy attacks or are we talking about long range attacks. I think that good MA training would be an asset to any army. I don’t understand why you are talking about armies anyway. My point with bring up the roots of Daito Ryu was simple, to put things into perspective. One art was developed to deal with civil disputes verses an art with its roots in mealy specialized warfare. No comparison!
By the way Yudansha you read as though you were quite upset. I wasn’t trying to attack you or anything. I was simply trying to point out regardless of all the arts Bruce practiced he never mastered any of them, so he didn’t have a master’s perspective when he developed Jeet Kune Do, much unlike O’sensei who had letters of mastery in varying schools of Budo including Daito Ryu (which is just about unhead of). You need to so the BIG picture when you create an art not just small parts of many pictures. In Japan they have a saying, “there are many paths that lead to the summit of mount Fuji.” You can walk on each of those paths without ever reaching the top, just like you can practice many arts with out see the larger picture, because you keep starting over again. Thing is if you don’t take at least one of those paths all the way up to the top you’ll never have the perspective of see everything from the top of the mountain, although you’ll many varying perspectives of the base of the mountain.
I hope you got my points this time without getting hung up on the details.