It's amazing

Status
Not open for further replies.

Donald Lee Wilkey

A Steven Seagal fan
how Steven Seagal goes on and on amidst these trying individuals in the tabloids with their attacks on him through the years

Heavenly Father bless you Steven Seagal for not allowing disgruntled tabloid writers with all of their hatreds and negative shots against you

I guess these tabloid writers get off on themselves spreading rumors and slandering others in order to make a $buck and keep their own survival going? :confused:

You'll always be in my prayers Steven Seagal :yin: As always, hang in there Steven Seagal !
 

Donald Lee Wilkey

A Steven Seagal fan
I guess it's like fellow actor Tom Muzila once stated in a magazine, "Steven Seagal's will is like an armored tank that will go through anything that gets in his way!"
 

marky96

Active Member
Donald Lee Wilkey;202150 said:
I guess it's like fellow actor Tom Muzila once stated in a magazine, "Steven Seagal's will is like an armored tank that will go through anything that gets in his way!"

Including, if these allegations are true, the strength of a young girl who refused to have sexual relations with him.
 

Donald Lee Wilkey

A Steven Seagal fan
marky96;202178 said:
Including, if these allegations are true, the strength of a young girl who refused to have sexual relations with him.

just curious marky, why would you even consider these allegations to be true at all? :confused:
 

marky96

Active Member
I would consider that they might be true because of the evidence that I have seen so far. There have been rumors concerning Seagal's conduct with women back from when he first began his film career. We know his history with his wives. We know the rumors and allegations from film directors and producers as to why he is often late onto film sets. Fair enough this girl may well be a manipulator of men but the story to me sounds too unbelievable to made up.

So Donald Lee Wilkey, why would you consider these allegations to not be true?
 

Donald Lee Wilkey

A Steven Seagal fan
Not to quote the phrase 'we're all human', but it's too soon to come to solid conclusions until all the facts have been meditated upon

Call it blind discernment on my part, but there's a reason why alot of folks in Hollywood dislike Steven Seagal, and that maybe the reason for these unsubstantiated slanderings throughout Steven Seagal's film presence and his career in films. I too haven't figured it out yet?

I am willing to admit that I maybe wrong in my threads/postings down through the years concerning the defenses of anyone in Hollywood

Even Clint Eastwood had a history of mentally abusing some of his gals, such as his first wife Maggie, and Sondra Locke

But I don't judge nor condemn Mr. Clint Eastwood :apeace:


marky96;202211 said:
I would consider that they might be true because of the evidence that I have seen so far. There have been rumors concerning Seagal's conduct with women back from when he first began his film career. We know his history with his wives. We know the rumors and allegations from film directors and producers as to why he is often late onto film sets. Fair enough this girl may well be a manipulator of men but the story to me sounds too unbelievable to made up.

So Donald Lee Wilkey, why would you consider these allegations to not be true?
 

marky96

Active Member
Donald Lee Wilkey;202214 said:
Not to quote the phrase 'we're all human', but it's too soon to come to solid conclusions until all the facts have been meditated upon

Call it blind discernment on my part, but there's a reason why alot of folks in Hollywood dislike Steven Seagal, and that maybe the reason for these unsubstantiated slanderings throughout Steven Seagal's film presence and his career in films. I too haven't figured it out yet?

I am willing to admit that I maybe wrong in my threads/postings down through the years concerning the defenses of anyone in Hollywood

Even Clint Eastwood had a history of mentally abusing some of his gals, such as his first wife Maggie, and Sondra Locke

But I don't judge nor condemn Mr. Clint Eastwood :apeace:

And I don't judge nor condemn Mr. Steven Seagal. I have always said that he deserves to be considered innocent until proven guilty. And yes there have been many 'unsubstantiated slanderings' about him and I think that is the whole point. No smoke without fire.
 

charles

Charles
"Heavenly father bless Steven Seagal"? You've got to be kidding me! I am a HUGE fan of Seagal's, but I've got to say, I thought that everyone knew that he was a HUGE slimebag and a hypocrite in real life. It's just that I realize that most entertainers are. You know, if I didn't watch the movies of actors whom I couldn't stand in real life then there wouldn't be many movies that I could watch.
 

marky96

Active Member
charles;202225 said:
"Heavenly father bless Steven Seagal"? You've got to be kidding me! I am a HUGE fan of Seagal's, but I've got to say, I thought that everyone knew that he was a HUGE slimebag and a hypocrite in real life. It's just that I realize that most entertainers are. You know, if I didn't watch the movies of actors whom I couldn't stand in real life then there wouldn't be many movies that I could watch.

Exactly right charles. To those of us who want to realize the truth, the fact that Seagal is a 'slimebag' has been well know for years. To be honest it has only been a matter of time until something like this has come out in the press.
 

ORANGATUANG

Wildfire
charles;202225 said:
"Heavenly father bless Steven Seagal"? You've got to be kidding me! I am a HUGE fan of Seagal's, but I've got to say, I thought that everyone knew that he was a HUGE slimebag and a hypocrite in real life. It's just that I realize that most entertainers are. You know, if I didn't watch the movies of actors whom I couldn't stand in real life then there wouldn't be many movies that I could watch.



Talk about the pot calling the kettle black..in one sentence you say he is an slime bag and hypocrite which i would be very care ful thanks ..and in an other sentence you say you are an fan of his ..i guess it takes all sorts to be an di.ck head doesnt it ..but like some say it will all be worked out sooner or later and i know who my money is on..not some little ???..oh your joking i write some thing like di.ck head and get blocked out but other losers can write slime bag and hypocrite and it stays ..
 

marky96

Active Member
ORANGATUANG;202229 said:
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black..in one sentence you say he is an slime bag and hypocrite which i would be very care ful thanks ..and in an other sentence you say you are an fan of his ..i guess it takes all sorts to be an di.ck head doesnt it ..but like some say it will all be worked out sooner or later and i know who my money is on..not some little ???..oh your joking i write some thing like di.ck head and get blocked out but other losers can write slime bag and hypocrite and it stays ..

I agree with charles. Although I am a big Seagal fan that doesn't get way from the fact that the way he conducts himself off screen is like a slimebag. Doesn't stop me watching his films though. Perhaps some people on here would benefit from taking similar views, rather than just following Seagal blindly like a sheep no matter what he does. Like you say this whole sorry mess will be worked out sooner or later and I know who my money is on.

And ORANGATUANG she is not some little ???, she is the victim of a serious sexual assault until proven otherwise just as Seagal is innocent until proven guilty, so I would be very careful if I was you thanks. Like you say it takes all sorts to be 'an di.ck head doesnt it'? It also takes all sorts to be a loser now doesn't it? Maybe the reason that you get blocked out when you say such unnecessarily rude things is because you just can't seem to control the urge to dismiss people out of hand without giving sensible counter arguments and I fear these urges will be your undoing.
 

TheDean!

Member
Sorry to interupt.

marky96;202232 said:
she is the victim of a serious sexual assault until proven otherwise .


Quite the opposite in fact. Anyone can make any type of claim. Until there are witnesses, and, more importantly, physical evidence, her claims are useless.
Besides, form what i've read more people have now thrown their names into the "Steven Seagal sexually assaulted me" hat. It is obvious they are just out for money. As for the original "victim", I don't believe a word she says for the following reason: If I was attacked, i'd go to the police and have the attacker arrested. I would NOT go straight to a lawyer and sue for a million dollars. THAT is the most suspicious thing about this whole issue.
 

marky96

Active Member
TheDean!;202233 said:
Sorry to interupt.




Quite the opposite in fact. Anyone can make any type of claim. Until there are witnesses, and, more importantly, physical evidence, her claims are useless.
Besides, form what i've read more people have now thrown their names into the "Steven Seagal sexually assaulted me" hat. It is obvious they are just out for money. As for the original "victim", I don't believe a word she says for the following reason: If I was attacked, i'd go to the police and have the attacker arrested. I would NOT go straight to a lawyer and sue for a million dollars. THAT is the most suspicious thing about this whole issue.

Well I don't think that anyone who alleges that they have been sexually assaulted deserves to have their claims dismissed as 'useless'. What happens if she was proved right? Surely the fact that more people have come forward with similar allegations makes this all the more likely that Seagal has committed some sort of impropriety. I have no problem with the fact that the original victim and others are out for money. If they feel that money would better help them rebuild their shattered lives then why not? Seagal and his production company certainly has enough money for the payouts, we as his fans have after all been bankrolling him, even when the quality of his films is poor. And after all, if he is found guilty, and I'm in no way saying that he will be, then a few payouts will be better for him anyway, so he can get back to work as soon as possible. As for Kayden Nguyen, well perhaps she didn't go to the police in New Orleans because she knew that Seagal was a reserve deputy chief, with many years and many friends on the force.
 
Claims mean nothing, until there is an evidence

Steven Seagal is under siege now, that's for sure. A lot of ladies claim, that they had some problems with Seagal and so many fans do not belive in Steven Seagal's innocence now. BUT In my opinion this all can be only a big attempt to destroy Seagal and get a lot of money into own pockets. There has not been any real evidence (audio, video, some photos or a witness etc.), so that I really do not think, that Seagal did this sexual assault. Nguyen's claims mean nothing at the court, she has to bring something more if she wants to succeed at the court. .....

The Dean: Quite the opposite in fact. Anyone can make any type of claim. Until there are witnesses, and, more importantly, physical evidence, her claims are useless.
Besides, form what i've read more people have now thrown their names into the "Steven Seagal sexually assaulted me" hat. It is obvious they are just out for money. As for the original "victim", I don't believe a word she says for the following reason: If I was attacked, i'd go to the police and have the attacker arrested. I would NOT go straight to a lawyer and sue for a million dollars. THAT is the most suspicious thing about this whole issue.
I totally agree with TheDean.
 

marky96

Active Member
SeagalMovieFan;202235 said:
Steven Seagal is under siege now, that's for sure. A lot of ladies claim, that they had some problems with Seagal and so many fans do not belive in Steven Seagal's innocence now. BUT In my opinion this all can be only a big attempt to destroy Seagal and get a lot of money into own pockets. There has not been any real evidence (audio, video, some photos or a witness etc.), so that I really do not think, that Seagal did this sexual assault. Nguyen's claims mean nothing at the court, she has to bring something more if she wants to succeed at the court. .....

I also think that fan support is turning away from Seagal now that more women have come forward. I think if someone had wanted to try and destroy Seagal they would have done it much earlier when he was at the height of his fame, and now faded and jaded as he is now. After all there were incidents and rumors surrounding Seagal that started back at the very start of his movie career. Besides, why make up a story that is so full of outlandish details. As detailed in the court documents (which some of us have read in full, and others clearly haven't) Kayden Nguyen is willing to give details to help prove her case. And her or any other persons claims of sexual harassment will always mean something in court.

The Dean: Quite the opposite in fact. Anyone can make any type of claim. Until there are witnesses, and, more importantly, physical evidence, her claims are useless.
Besides, form what i've read more people have now thrown their names into the "Steven Seagal sexually assaulted me" hat. It is obvious they are just out for money. As for the original "victim", I don't believe a word she says for the following reason: If I was attacked, i'd go to the police and have the attacker arrested. I would NOT go straight to a lawyer and sue for a million dollars. THAT is the most suspicious thing about this whole issue.
I totally agree with TheDean.

And I don't, as I set out in the arguments above!
 

Ruthless

New Member
I really don't get why someone would chase after Seagal, let's be honest, there's richer and HOTTER stars to go after. But the problem is that some fans, like those of Chris Brown (who assaulted a woman) are willing to ignore that their 'hero' could be at a fault. Maybe he did commit those crimes, maybe he didn't. But what gives you the right to judge a woman who hasn't been charged with anything yet?!

As far as i can see, both parties are liable for what they're been accused of, but shouldn't be judged until the truth comes out. The problem is that Seagal has been accused of this before and while this woman may be a entrapment for men, she doesn't deserve the name calling. Plus the more women that join her and have proof (if they do) that Seagal did these things, the more fans he's gonna lose.
 

marky96

Active Member
Ruthless;202245 said:
I really don't get why some 'tramp' would chase after Seagal, let's be honest, there's richer and HOTTER stars to go after. But the problem is that some fans, like those of Chris Brown (who assaulted a woman) are willing to ignore that their 'hero' could be at a fault. Maybe he did commit those crimes, maybe he didn't. But what gives you the right to judge a woman who hasn't been charged with anything yet?!

As far as i can see, both parties are liable for what they're been accused of, but shouldn't be judged until the truth comes out. The problem is that Seagal has been accused of this before and while this woman may be a entrapment for men, she doesn't deserve the name calling. Plus the more women that join her and have proof (if they do) that Seagal did these things, the more fans he's gonna lose.

Couldn't agree more Ruthless. I fear that he is already losing many fans.
 

ORANGATUANG

Wildfire
Why is it that when Steven does wrong you find out whom the most committed fans are the rest well they just want to get on the band wagon and carry on like cut snakes ..as for this person i say you can catch alot more with honey then you can do with vinegar..


now it speak in language some will understand..as for Steven losing fans well that was happening way before this came to veiw so dont come the custard and have that weak excuse he is losing fans because of this crap..every actor loses fans ..just the way it is and i can say this monkey aint going any way ..and if people dont like what i write well stiff cheddar..
 
Yes many people have mentioned that she was on the Tyra Banks show a year ago. The most interesting part about her appearing on that show was the fact that THE EPISODE WAS CALLED "GAY KINGDOM", THIS CHICK IS A LESBIAN. Do I know if Steven is innocent or not, NO. But as a fan I will be behind him through whatever comes his way, thats what true loyalty is all about. If you want to stand up for this chick and refer to her as a "victim" but yet in the same sentence say "innocent until proven guilty"..YOU are the one who doesn't make any sense. ANYONE can claim this happened. The fact is, she still hasn't filed any criminal charges with the Jefferson Parish Police dept. If she was accusing a normal guy of these acts, do you think she would be asking for a million dollars? NO. I'm starting to get sick of "marky96" critisizing every post on here. WE GET IT. You're a "fan" of stevens' but you think this story is too detailed to be "made up". The fact is, I live and work in Los Angeles. I hear stories like this ALL the time. I admit that it does get old after a while hearing these stories. This girl moved out here to become an actress. This town is full of people trying to make something of themselves and become wealthy. EVERYTHING has to do with money out here, as sad as it is to say that, its the truth that many don't want to admit. So before you start standing up for this chick you know very little about, take all that into consideration. I know I have.
 
STEVENPULLMYHAIR;202254 said:
Yes many people have mentioned that she was on the Tyra Banks show a year ago. The most interesting part about her appearing on that show was the fact that THE EPISODE WAS CALLED "GAY KINGDOM", THIS CHICK IS A LESBIAN. Do I know if Steven is innocent or not, NO. But as a fan I will be behind him through whatever comes his way, thats what true loyalty is all about. If you want to stand up for this chick and refer to her as a "victim" but yet in the same sentence say "innocent until proven guilty"..YOU are the one who doesn't make any sense. ANYONE can claim this happened. The fact is, she still hasn't filed any criminal charges with the Jefferson Parish Police dept. If she was accusing a normal guy of these acts, do you think she would be asking for a million dollars? NO. I'm starting to get sick of "marky96" critisizing every post on here. WE GET IT. You're a "fan" of stevens' but you think this story is too detailed to be "made up". The fact is, I live and work in Los Angeles. I hear stories like this ALL the time. I admit that it does get old after a while hearing these stories. This girl moved out here to become an actress. This town is full of people trying to make something of themselves and become wealthy. EVERYTHING has to do with money out here, as sad as it is to say that, its the truth that many don't want to admit. So before you start standing up for this chick you know very little about, take all that into consideration. I know I have.

Exactly said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top