I think I have to make a point here. It's calling to me. None of Seagal's movies are "good" persay; well, good as in award worthy. But they are enjoyable, and good in the true sense of the word. Even his "bad" movies are great. In fact, the worse his movies are, the better they are. They become best-worst films. So in the end, Seagal doesn't actually have any bad movies. For the bad are so bad that they're good. Like Fulci Zombie movies, or the Evil Dead flicks.