I'm just curious about something, Robert; with Steven being in fewer action scenes, overweight, practically invisible in the shadows, and 80% of his voice dubbed, how, exactly, does this make Submerged a really good Steven Seagal movie? Or is it a good movie because of everything else in it EXCEPT for Steven? And how can this be good, and why is this the direction fans seem to want him to take?
I watch Steven Seagal films to see Steven do his own fight scenes, say his own lines and well, just be able to see him (not to mention have a good storyline, interesting characters and good production values, which the majority of those reviewing said it didn't have).
See, this is what I don't get, and I guess I need someone to explain it to me.