Review : Attack Force
- Thread starter Administrator
- Start date
latinojazz
Well-Known Member
suziwong said:Just Finished "Attack Force" and my humble review:
Girls were really bad and incapable I have ever seen before at Seagal's movie. I wonder where did he find these girls? (I was here)
IN THE RUMANIAN BROTHELS, THE BITCHES CLUBS, YOU KNOW HOW THE MEN(WE)ARE..EVEN STEVEN, OUR DICKS ARE untameable, uncontrollable, indomitable...ungovernable, unruly
I laughed alot of the final scene when Steven fighting Romanian girl. It was absurd and funny... He is the the Best Action Star, he is the real master of martial arts, and he is fighting inexperienced girl, She is not an actress nor stund. Really It didn't suit him..
YES, OF COURSE, BUT THE BITCH IS AN ALIEN-VAMPIRE.DRUGGED WHORE, SUPERFAST BITCH, AND STEVEN BEATS HER WITHOUT SUPERPOWERS OR DRUGS, THAT´S THE POINT, MY LOVELY SUZI
The Most important: Steven Seagal
Steven was very good for me I liked him. His make-up, costumes and his light was very good. He was very handsome as always.. I wish he didn't play last scene he lost all his carisma !!
YES, YES, YS, YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHH, STEVEN IS GREAT!!!
Totally I can not say it was the Worst Steven Seagal Film..
I THINK THE SAME OF YOU
I think, what you are waiting from the Steven Seagal's films. I always enjoy to see him in movies. If you look at this from this point of you "Attack Force" is "ehhhhhhhhhh !!!!! " movie for me.
My vote is : 7/10 (For Steven)
UHMMMMM....OK 7/10, IT´S FAIR.I´M WITH YOU.
LOT OF KISSES, SUZI
Suzi
THIS IS MY OPINION TOOOOOOOOOOO
Bad or Worse, that is the question?
<B>Bad or Worse that is the question.</B>
I thought the last two releases from Seagal were bad, but Attack Force is without question the WORST. How could he allow such a movie to be released and put his name to it? I already hesitated renting this one in fear that it might not live up to my expectations and boy was I right. Next time I will walk past it at the rental store. My god, what a bad dubbing. Why in the world could he not dubb over his own part in his own voice. They used some voice that was completely unrecognizable as that being of Seagal. In one scene Marshall (Seagal) talks to the admiral over the a speaker phone. The admiral did not know who was on the other end of the conversation until he heard Marshall's voice. He then replied "Ahh, Marshall I thought it might be you" acting as if he recognized the voice and Marshall replies "It's nice that you can still rcognize my voice admiral ....". This must have been an inside joke by the producers. It felt like a slap in the face. This movie is an INSULT to any Seagal fan. Shame on him for allowing such trash to be publisized. I'm done watching this guy in cheap production movies. Maybe he has more luck with his singing career, but don't hold your breath.
<B>Bad or Worse that is the question.</B>
I thought the last two releases from Seagal were bad, but Attack Force is without question the WORST. How could he allow such a movie to be released and put his name to it? I already hesitated renting this one in fear that it might not live up to my expectations and boy was I right. Next time I will walk past it at the rental store. My god, what a bad dubbing. Why in the world could he not dubb over his own part in his own voice. They used some voice that was completely unrecognizable as that being of Seagal. In one scene Marshall (Seagal) talks to the admiral over the a speaker phone. The admiral did not know who was on the other end of the conversation until he heard Marshall's voice. He then replied "Ahh, Marshall I thought it might be you" acting as if he recognized the voice and Marshall replies "It's nice that you can still rcognize my voice admiral ....". This must have been an inside joke by the producers. It felt like a slap in the face. This movie is an INSULT to any Seagal fan. Shame on him for allowing such trash to be publisized. I'm done watching this guy in cheap production movies. Maybe he has more luck with his singing career, but don't hold your breath.
hofmae said:<B>First Words:</B>
Ok, so first... It is a bad movie. Its starting really ok, but then it gets boring and really bad, even if the movie is not made bad technically, and the story is better than in the last few dtvs. But its bad... And you don't see Steven as much as in the last few dtvs.
<B>Story:</B>
So, the story is bad, but not as weird as in the last few dtvs. But still too weird. Why they don't do a SIMPLE ACTION FLICK!! I don't get it. So its about bitches and soldiers that are going crazy because of drugs, and Seagal is a Marshall that has to fight against them. Like i said its not that werid as in Shadow Man, and its a bit easier to follow, but still after 30-40 minutes its getting really boring. (Just more scenes where someone talks to each other, conspiracy here, betrayal there, and so on... i didn't like the story at all, even if its starts not "that bad"
2/5
<B>Action:</B>
The Action was bad. Not too much and bad. The editing was not extremely bad but still bad. A lot of shootous (But nothing special, just standard) with a lot of blood. Like always. There were not much action, and unfortunately no real fights. Just a big knife fighting with this special knives at the end, and a lot of soldier shootouts, but 90% of them in the dark. you don't see really much. its bad...
2/5
<B>Fights:</B>
Its starts cool when Steven is going out of a hummer and punches a guy down. But its only for 5 seconds, and like in every single fight in this movie its so extremely slowmotion, that its not cool, and the camera is so near to Steven that you can't see the movie really well. There are really no more cool fights with seagal. He punches one man down with 1 punch 20 minutes later. And then at the end there is a fight with this special knives, but really bad too, to much fast- and slowmotion and no cool moves. Really bad.
2/5
<B>Dubbing:</B>
There is A LOT of voice dubbing, and even if the voice dubbing is better than in other Seagal flicks its bad...
1/5
<B>Stunt Doubles:</B>
I don't remind seeing his stunt double so much, but its logical because there aren't really fight scenes with Steven. He just running around with a gun. A
2.5/5
<B>Acting:</B>
The action was ok. But nothing special.
3/5
<B>Humor:</B>
There is no humor. Just one or 2 one-liners. Thats it.
2/5
<B>CGI_Effects:</B>
There aren't much cgi effects, but if they are some, there made OK. No bad helicopter explosion or something like that. Really ok.
3.5/5
<B>Cinematography:</B>
Was ok... The story isn't good at all, but the cinematopgraphy was not "that bad". But still bad and much worse than in dtvs like Belly of the Beast as example...
2.5/5
<B>Music:</B>
Orchestral score, but not as good as in Shadow Man. Mostly the music is in background.
2.5/5
<B>Overall Rating:</B>
Im really disappointed. It starts not that bad, but after 30 minutes the story is getting crappy. Talking, Talking, Talking, shooting in the dark, Talking, one punch of Steven, Talking, Talking, Talking, A big shootout in the dark (you can't see who are the good and who are the bad guys), A slow motion knife fight with Steven, its over. So thats the movie! Really bad... Shadow Man was better even if it sucked too!!! We mad so much cricits about movies like "Out for a Kill" but they were so much better. A lot of fights, stories easy to follow and so on... Here we have a crappy story, no real fights, crappy action, just a bad movie, im really disappointed.
<B>Ill give it 2/5.</B>
Now im looking forward to Enemy of the Unseen (Flight of the Fury), as i know its coming out in Switzerland in German for RENTAL DVD at the 6. of March. Do you guys know when its coming out in America?! I think January or February, because the'yre coming ALWAYS at least 1 or 2 month before realease in Switzerland.
Lets hope its better than this crappy flick
i have just watched attack force this is my review
action:5/10--the action was ok but it was to flashy for my liking
fights:1/10--the worst fights ever.....very samiler to the fights in the foreinger ie badly shot(by the way the 2 films also had the same fight director in tom delmer)
acting:2/10--woeful acting even when it is seagals voice which is only about 20 percent of the film.also this along with out of reach and submerged are films that i will never watch again due to the constant dubbing
direction:4/10--the film had some good ideas but due to the editing and redubbing it is hard to judge how good michael keaush film would have been
overall:2/10--this is without doubt seagals worst ever film...even worse than black dawn and that takes some doing.....on the plus side i think flight of fury and once upon a time will be better and then we have prince of pistols and judas coming up.
action:5/10--the action was ok but it was to flashy for my liking
fights:1/10--the worst fights ever.....very samiler to the fights in the foreinger ie badly shot(by the way the 2 films also had the same fight director in tom delmer)
acting:2/10--woeful acting even when it is seagals voice which is only about 20 percent of the film.also this along with out of reach and submerged are films that i will never watch again due to the constant dubbing
direction:4/10--the film had some good ideas but due to the editing and redubbing it is hard to judge how good michael keaush film would have been
overall:2/10--this is without doubt seagals worst ever film...even worse than black dawn and that takes some doing.....on the plus side i think flight of fury and once upon a time will be better and then we have prince of pistols and judas coming up.
ORANGATUANG
Wildfire
If this movie is that bad when i see it i might just keep my oppinion to myself...and just wait for his next project..
ORANGATUANG
Wildfire
Iam STILL waiting to see it once again i will make my OWN mind up then...i dont care what other people say every one is different for crying out loud...if men think with there **** boy they must have alot of thinking to do...
ORANGATUANG
Wildfire
I will..
starmaiden
Member
i do agree with Heather 100%
kornsme182
New Member
The Good: Not much...a few funny cliche things in it like when they say the Seagal is a bad muther f'er and that he cant be controlled.
The bad: Made zero sense. Seagal was dubbed during half of the movie. Seagal did his own fight scenes but they were edited so bad that it didnt matter at all.
This was right there with Out of reach as being the most boring Seagal film ever
The bad: Made zero sense. Seagal was dubbed during half of the movie. Seagal did his own fight scenes but they were edited so bad that it didnt matter at all.
This was right there with Out of reach as being the most boring Seagal film ever
Mason
Well-Known Member
i liked it alot!
I watched Attack Force last evening. It was actualy better than people giving it credit to be .. The only thing I didnt like was the cordination of fightscenes. They werent filmend verry good, and I hate it when they put them in slowmotion. I wanna see Seagal move as fast as he does in real life .. Then there is the dubbing of Seagal's voice wich is totaly lame, but it wasnt through out the whole film as somebody says .. But other than that i liked it alot.
I watched Attack Force last evening. It was actualy better than people giving it credit to be .. The only thing I didnt like was the cordination of fightscenes. They werent filmend verry good, and I hate it when they put them in slowmotion. I wanna see Seagal move as fast as he does in real life .. Then there is the dubbing of Seagal's voice wich is totaly lame, but it wasnt through out the whole film as somebody says .. But other than that i liked it alot.
ORANGATUANG
Wildfire
Yes i think that if he stuffs up once there all going to be duds thats not the case..like i said iam looking forward to seeing it like his others..
I've just seen the movie and I didn't like it. The movie starts interesting, but after half an hour this movie derails. The movie is very boring from that moment on.
I'm watching a Seagal movie to enjoy the man. But that's impossible in this movie. We don't hear is own voice for almost the entire movie and we see stunt-doubles. I'm honest: the makers destroyed this movie.
I'm looking forward to Flight of Fury. This one is going to be nice, because worse than Attack Force isn't possible..
I'm watching a Seagal movie to enjoy the man. But that's impossible in this movie. We don't hear is own voice for almost the entire movie and we see stunt-doubles. I'm honest: the makers destroyed this movie.
I'm looking forward to Flight of Fury. This one is going to be nice, because worse than Attack Force isn't possible..
I've just seen the movie and I didn't like it. The movie starts interesting, but after half an hour this movie derails. The movie is very boring from that moment on.
I'm watching a Seagal movie to enjoy the man. But that's impossible in this movie. We don't hear is own voice for almost the entire movie and we see stunt-doubles. I'm honest: the makers destroyed this movie.
I'm looking forward to Flight of Fury. This one is going to be nice, because worse than Attack Force isn't possible..
I'm watching a Seagal movie to enjoy the man. But that's impossible in this movie. We don't hear is own voice for almost the entire movie and we see stunt-doubles. I'm honest: the makers destroyed this movie.
I'm looking forward to Flight of Fury. This one is going to be nice, because worse than Attack Force isn't possible..
Mama San
Administrator
I have set through his later movies and kept hoping for something better the next time. I'm sorry but even Van Damm couldn't make a movie this bad. He walked through Attack Force as though he hadn't slept in 6 weeks. I finally heard his "true" voice at least once or twice.
As I remember, (I sat through it only once, I couldn't stand a second viewing)
he had a "fight" (if you want to call it that) in the first of the film. A fairly good fight? Yes, if he was an amateur. But as for a fight up to the old Seagal standards? NO!!!!! And that last fight with a woman, no less, was sickening. He acted as though he had never taken a defensive lesson in his life!
I'm an old woman with Rheumatoid Arthritis and congestive heart failure and I still could have picked up a rock and bashed that broad's head in.
His movies are getting worse instead of better. What in the world is wrong with him?
I wonder....if he is so ready to let his movie career die this horrible death,
then what happens when he get bored with his music? Does it die the same way? I would normaly defend him to the bitter end but in Attack Force there's nothing to defend! Hopefully his next film will be "better", it surely couldn't get any worse!
If you think I'm disgusted with him right now, you are right, I am!!!
God bless,
Mama san/Casey
As I remember, (I sat through it only once, I couldn't stand a second viewing)
he had a "fight" (if you want to call it that) in the first of the film. A fairly good fight? Yes, if he was an amateur. But as for a fight up to the old Seagal standards? NO!!!!! And that last fight with a woman, no less, was sickening. He acted as though he had never taken a defensive lesson in his life!
I'm an old woman with Rheumatoid Arthritis and congestive heart failure and I still could have picked up a rock and bashed that broad's head in.
His movies are getting worse instead of better. What in the world is wrong with him?
I wonder....if he is so ready to let his movie career die this horrible death,
then what happens when he get bored with his music? Does it die the same way? I would normaly defend him to the bitter end but in Attack Force there's nothing to defend! Hopefully his next film will be "better", it surely couldn't get any worse!
If you think I'm disgusted with him right now, you are right, I am!!!
God bless,
Mama san/Casey
Liat
New Member
I watched Attack Force yesterday
and i'm very dissapointed.... i've never seen such a bad and borring movie with STEVEN SEAGAL. I don't understand what happened, his movies were always so good, i don't know even one of them who was such bad like this one.
But, i still admire him and believe that the next movie will be better.
Hope so.
(Sorry for my english..)
and i'm very dissapointed.... i've never seen such a bad and borring movie with STEVEN SEAGAL. I don't understand what happened, his movies were always so good, i don't know even one of them who was such bad like this one.
But, i still admire him and believe that the next movie will be better.
Hope so.
(Sorry for my english..)
masterd48
Member
agreed Attack Force is the lowest of lows for Seagal, it is his "Manos: The Hands Of Fate"
they could have at least got a woman who knows martial arts, all she did was fly her hands about to make it look like some martial art while Seagal did the same thing faster and they just looked like they were slapping each other
also anyone find it ridiculoius that Rena sent peopel flying through multiple walls yet one slap or kick by Seagal and she is completely knocked out?
they could have at least got a woman who knows martial arts, all she did was fly her hands about to make it look like some martial art while Seagal did the same thing faster and they just looked like they were slapping each other
also anyone find it ridiculoius that Rena sent peopel flying through multiple walls yet one slap or kick by Seagal and she is completely knocked out?
ORANGATUANG
Wildfire
Iam flabbergasted...I hope that never happens his music go down the tubes...sounds like he better get his act into gear then or some of us fans will come show him how its done...hey maybe even my brothers could kick his butt...